Case index/Zengids and the Second Crusade

24 June 1148 · Palmarea / Acre

Council of Acre

CouncilDiplomacy

On 24 June 1148 at Palmarea near Acre, Conrad III, Louis VII, the young King Baldwin III, Queen Melisende and the barons of Jerusalem discussed the Second Crusade's objective. The meeting decided to attack Damascus, at times an ally of the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

Council of Acre
Historical site·American Colony Photo Department, Library of Congress / Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

RESEARCH DOSSIER

Historical analysis of the event

01

Background

In spring 1148 both Conrad and Louis reached Jerusalem. Recovering Edessa was unrealistic with the forces left after the losses in Anatolia. Louis had rejected the campaign against Aleppo proposed by Prince Raymond of Antioch. Damascus, under Mu'in al-Din Unur, was a city that at times cooperated with Jerusalem against Nur al-Din.

02

The meeting and the decision

According to William of Tyre, the meeting was attended by the two kings, King Baldwin III of Jerusalem, Queen Melisende, the patriarch, the masters of the military orders and the barons of the kingdom. No representatives came from Antioch, Tripoli or Edessa.

After long debate it was decided to besiege Damascus. Its proximity to Jerusalem, its wealth and its religious prestige made Damascus an attractive target for the Western rulers. Reasons behind the decision also include concern that Damascus was drawing closer to Nur al-Din and the tension over Bosra in 1147.

03

Outcome and significance

The decision meant abandoning Edessa, the declared reason for the crusade, entirely. The attack on Damascus increased the city's distrust of Jerusalem and prepared the conditions that made it easier for Nur al-Din to take Damascus in 1154. The Palmarea decision is therefore seen as the most debated strategic choice of the Second Crusade.

04

Sources and debates

The only detailed account of the meeting is by William of Tyre, writing some thirty years later. Who proposed the decision, and whether Damascus was really drawing closer to Nur al-Din, are debated; some scholars argue that it was a reasonable choice in the circumstances of the day.

Method note

Dates, places and figures in this record compare the principal narrative sources with modern scholarship. Where the sources disagree this is stated in the text; for a thesis or publication, consult the relevant edition and page reference.