Birth and death dates unknown · Historical figure of the Crusading era
I. Mesud
I. Mesud (Birth and death dates unknown) — Historical figure of the Crusading era. This dossier combines the biographical record with dated events and the listed primary and secondary sources.
No verified depiction added
BIOGRAPHICAL DOSSIER
Life and historical role
Life and political setting
I. Mesud is documented as historical figure of the crusading era in records connected with Eskişehir region, Mount Honaz / Denizli. The available sources do not support assigning unrecorded birth, death or family details.
Career during the Crusading era
The documented career is reconstructed below from the dated event records and their listed narrative sources.
Documented activity: a chronological record
On 25 October 1147, I. Mesud appears in the atlas record “Defeat of the German army at Dorylaeum” at Eskişehir region. The event is documented through Odo of Deuil, Niketas Khoniates, TDV İA, ‘Haçlılar’. On 7 January 1148, I. Mesud appears in the atlas record “Crossing of Mount Honaz” at Mount Honaz / Denizli. The event is documented through Odo of Deuil, Niketas Khoniates, World History Encyclopedia kronolojisi.
Allies, opponents and geographical range
I. Mesud appears in the same records as Conrad III, Louis VII. Co-occurrence does not always indicate alliance: the connection may involve command, dynastic rivalry, captivity, negotiation or direct conflict.
The principal geographical range represented in the atlas is Eskişehir region; Mount Honaz / Denizli. These places record not only presence but also the supply lines, diplomatic contacts and limits of authority relevant to the biography.
Results of recorded decisions
The “Defeat of the German army at Dorylaeum” dossier records the consequences of this episode and identifies the source problems that limit a definitive reconstruction. Use this record as a starting point for comparing narrative sources, military practice, captivity, negotiation and the legal treatment of war.
The “Crossing of Mount Honaz” dossier records the consequences of this episode and identifies the source problems that limit a definitive reconstruction. Use this record as a starting point for comparing narrative sources, military practice, captivity, negotiation and the legal treatment of war.
Sources and historiography
Latin chronicles and dynastic narratives make the person's role visible, while charters, treaties, letters and Arabic, Greek, Armenian or Syriac accounts provide independent controls. Later heroic portraits are evidence for memory and reception, not contemporary biography.
Names and titles vary between languages; variant spellings and titles should be searched together in catalogues and texts. Approximate dates remain marked as such, and later literary or visual fame is separated from contemporary testimony.
Biographical statements are tied to the sources listed on this page and to the connected event dossiers. Approximate or disputed dates remain marked; missing information is not filled by conjecture, and later literary or visual representations are not treated as contemporary portraits.